Skip to main content

Posts

The Control Spectrum for Any Agent

  Not every department needs the same level of AI autonomy. And that's a feature, not a limitation. **Marketing: Near-full autonomy** AI runs campaigns, humans review weekly **Legal: AI-assisted only** AI drafts, attorneys approve everything **Support: Full automation (Tier 1) / Supervised (Enterprise)** Automate routine tickets, escalate enterprise customers **Sales: Supervised automation** Auto-approve under $50K, escalate above One platform. Per-department policies. Complete audit trail. And here's the part most people miss: This works for internal AI workflows. It also works for external autonomous agents — OpenClaw, Claude Code, Cursor, whatever your engineers adopt next. Connect any agent to the Runtime Gateway. Define policies per team, per tool, per risk level. The agents keep their autonomy. You keep your governance. The platform that governs ALL your AI — not just the AI you built. **[Why 80% of Fortune 500 are running AI agents but only 14.4% have governance →](https...
Post a Comment
Read more
Recent posts

The Solution

Autonomous AI agents are here. OpenClaw, Claude Code, LangChain, CrewAI, custom internal tools — and they're multiplying. Now enterprises need: → Visibility into what agents are doing → Risk scoring on every action → Audit trails for compliance → Pre-action governance (not just logging) → The ability to suspend rogue agents instantly We call it the Runtime Gateway. Every action — from any agent, any framework — evaluated through Quality, Governance, Security, and Monitoring before it executes. ALLOW. DENY. ESCALATE. And it's tool-agnostic by design. Any governance solution built for one tool is already obsolete. The Runtime Gateway doesn't care whether the action came from OpenClaw, Claude Code, a LangChain workflow, or your custom Python script. Your employees get the AI tools they want. You get the governance you need. Everyone wins. **[See the Runtime Gateway architecture →]( https://aictrlnet.com/blog/2026/02/openai-validates-autonomous-agent-category/ )** #AICtrlNet #R...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Shadow AI Crisis

  "There are companies finding engineers who have given AI agents full access to their devices." — Pukar Hamal, CEO of SecurityPal Shadow IT was bad enough. Shadow AI is worse. OpenClaw. Claude Code. Cursor. Custom internal agents. Your engineers are running autonomous AI tools that don't just access data — they act on it. With persistent permissions. While you sleep. And you can't stop it. Your best engineers will use the best tools. Block them, and they'll find workarounds or leave for companies that let them move fast. Microsoft's Cyber Pulse Report found 29% of employees admit to using unsanctioned AI agents. The real number is higher. The answer isn't blocking. It's governing. Runtime governance means every agent action — from any tool, any framework — gets evaluated before execution: ALLOW, DENY, or ESCALATE to a human. Your engineers keep their tools. You get visibility and control. That's the deal. **[The full Shadow AI breakdown and what t...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Market Position Nobody Occupies

 I drew this 2x2 last week and realized something:                                                                       DIY              Expert Guidance                                          ┌──────────────┬──────────────┐ Full Auto Only             │  OpenClaw                        │ Enterprise                            │                              ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Expert Guidance, Built In

  "Sounds great, but I don't have a technical team." I hear this from small business owners every week. They WANT AI automation. They understand the value. They've seen the demos. But they don't have: - A technical team to configure it - Weeks to learn a new platform - Budget for expensive consultants So they do nothing. That's why every AICtrlNet Business tier includes expert hours. Not an add-on. Not an upsell. Built in. 2-8 hours per month depending on your tier. Use them for: - Initial configuration - Workflow optimization - Strategy sessions - Whatever you need We call it DWY — Doing With You. Not DIY self-serve where you figure it out alone. Not expensive SI firms charging $500/hour. Expert guidance, built into the subscription. The control spectrum meets you where you are. Expert guidance gets you there. **[See our pricing with built-in expert hours →]( https://hitlai.net/pricing )** **Hashtags**: #SMB #AI #SmallBusiness #Automation
Post a Comment
Read more

Market Segmentation Nobody Talks About

  he AI automation market isn't segmented by company size. It's segmented by comfort level. **Cautious adopters (60% of market)** - Want AI value - Not ready for full automation - Will adopt if there's a safe path **Supervised adopters (25% of market)** - Want AI doing work - Need human approval - Comfortable with oversight **Full automation seekers (15% of market)** - Ready to hand over control - Want AI running operations - Aggressive adopters Every AI platform I've seen targets that 15%. "Full automation!" "AI does everything!" "No human bottlenecks!" And they wonder why adoption stalls. Meanwhile, 85% of the market is saying: "This sounds great but I'm not ready." The opportunity isn't convincing the 85% to become the 15%. It's building a platform that serves ALL of them. AI insights and suggestions for the cautious. Supervised automation for the middle ground. Full autonomy for the aggressive. One platform. Entire...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why Enterprises Won't Buy Your AI (Yet)

  Your AI is impressive. Your demo is killer. The pilot went great. And then the enterprise deal stalls. Not because the AI isn't good. Because somewhere between the demo and the purchase order, someone asked questions you couldn't answer. The data tells the story: - **Only 15%** of IT application leaders are even *considering* fully autonomous AI agents (Gartner, 2025) - **Only 13%** strongly agreed they had the right governance structures for AI - **Only 31%** of organizations have a formal AI policy — despite 83% believing employees use AI (ISACA) Here are the deal-killing questions and what buyers actually want to hear: **"What happens when the AI is wrong?"** Bad: "It rarely makes mistakes." Good: "High-risk actions require human approval. Full audit trails. Error rates monitored in real-time." **"Can you prove what the AI decided and why?"** Bad: "Sophisticated machine learning algorithms." Good: "Every action logged ...
Post a Comment
Read more