** Why "Just Add an Approval Step" Is Harder Than It Sounds
Every AI demo follows the same script:
1. "Watch this AI agent analyze your data..."
2. "Now it's generating recommendations..."
3. "And here it executes automatically!"
Then someone asks: "What if the recommendation is wrong?"
The presenter pauses. "Well, you could add an approval step."
That's where the demo ends. Because in practice, "add an approval step" means:
- Building a custom notification system
- Creating a UI for reviewing AI decisions
- Preserving context so reviewers understand what they're approving
- Handling timeouts, escalations, and edge cases
- Maintaining audit trails for compliance
Gartner found organizations spend 40% of their AI budget on "integration and operationalization"—which includes human oversight mechanisms.
**The Three Problems**
In my experience, human-in-the-loop fails for three reasons:
1. **Context Collapse** - The AI knows why it made a decision, but that reasoning doesn't reach the human reviewer
2. **Workflow Impedance Mismatch** - AI operates in milliseconds; humans operate in hours or days
3. **The Automation Paradox** - The better AI gets, the harder it is for humans to catch its mistakes
The fix isn't adding humans as an afterthought. It's designing systems where humans are first-class participants.
**[Read the full breakdown →](https://aictrlnet.com/blog/2026/01/missing-piece-humans/)**
Comments
Post a Comment